<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for One Bad Pixel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://onebadpixel.com/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://onebadpixel.com/blog</link>
	<description>When a good pixel goes bad.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 17:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on New Acoustic Research speakers by Jim</title>
		<link>http://onebadpixel.com/blog/2008/06/10/new-acoustic-research-speakers/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 03:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onebadpixel.com/blog/?p=82#comment-136</guid>
		<description>Where abouts are you located?  I am somewhat interested in the AR1s if you would consider breaking the set.

While the exact value is very difficult to determine, they do have some value.  The company went out of business a few years back and the hi-res series was not picked up by the company that acquired the audio division, so many consumers that are simply looking to purchase a set for their home or home theater will not likely be interested in paying what would be a fairly reasonable market value.  Your prospective buyers are going to by mid-range enthusiast or entry-level professional, as these are fairly nice speakers, however it takes a certain love to want something like this as they aren't the cheapest to repair when things go wrong.

Did you replace the set already with a smaller setup, or are you still looking?  I have their baby brothers, the AR11 mains, AR17 surrounds, and AR4C center which are a little more space efficient.. Perhaps we can work something out.

That being said, The approximate retail on the AR1 were about 1200-1400 a pair, and while you didnt mention their age, I would estimate that they are anywhere from 8-4 years old, and in mint.  I'm certainly not an expert, but I would expect that you could expect to get around 900 for the mains from somewhat that knew what they are, or about 650 from someone just looking for a set of speakers, depending on your need to sell them.

The center channel is a solid, nice sounding center. It retailed for about 400 or so, and I would expect around 250 or 200 (same buyer conditions apply).

The AR17s I don't know exactly what the retail was, but If I recall they were around 350 a pair, and would expect about 200/150 for them.  I recently bought a pair on eBay for 175.  Their bigger brother, the AR15 would net a slightly larger amount, but not much.

Feel free to email me at &lt;a href="mailto:jim@onebadpixel.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;jim@onebadpixel.com&lt;/a&gt; if you would like to discuss these in further detail, or discuss some possible arrangement to move them for you.
Jim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where abouts are you located?  I am somewhat interested in the AR1s if you would consider breaking the set.</p>
<p>While the exact value is very difficult to determine, they do have some value.  The company went out of business a few years back and the hi-res series was not picked up by the company that acquired the audio division, so many consumers that are simply looking to purchase a set for their home or home theater will not likely be interested in paying what would be a fairly reasonable market value.  Your prospective buyers are going to by mid-range enthusiast or entry-level professional, as these are fairly nice speakers, however it takes a certain love to want something like this as they aren&#8217;t the cheapest to repair when things go wrong.</p>
<p>Did you replace the set already with a smaller setup, or are you still looking?  I have their baby brothers, the AR11 mains, AR17 surrounds, and AR4C center which are a little more space efficient.. Perhaps we can work something out.</p>
<p>That being said, The approximate retail on the AR1 were about 1200-1400 a pair, and while you didnt mention their age, I would estimate that they are anywhere from 8-4 years old, and in mint.  I&#8217;m certainly not an expert, but I would expect that you could expect to get around 900 for the mains from somewhat that knew what they are, or about 650 from someone just looking for a set of speakers, depending on your need to sell them.</p>
<p>The center channel is a solid, nice sounding center. It retailed for about 400 or so, and I would expect around 250 or 200 (same buyer conditions apply).</p>
<p>The AR17s I don&#8217;t know exactly what the retail was, but If I recall they were around 350 a pair, and would expect about 200/150 for them.  I recently bought a pair on eBay for 175.  Their bigger brother, the AR15 would net a slightly larger amount, but not much.</p>
<p>Feel free to email me at <a href="mailto:jim@onebadpixel.com" rel="nofollow">jim@onebadpixel.com</a> if you would like to discuss these in further detail, or discuss some possible arrangement to move them for you.<br />
Jim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Acoustic Research speakers by tprevett</title>
		<link>http://onebadpixel.com/blog/2008/06/10/new-acoustic-research-speakers/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>tprevett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 00:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onebadpixel.com/blog/?p=82#comment-135</guid>
		<description>I have a complete set: AR1s, AR2C Center, and AR17 for the rear.  I've been trying to sell simply because I don't have enough space anywhere.  Do you have any idea what the value on these speakers would be.. they are all in mint condition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a complete set: AR1s, AR2C Center, and AR17 for the rear.  I&#8217;ve been trying to sell simply because I don&#8217;t have enough space anywhere.  Do you have any idea what the value on these speakers would be.. they are all in mint condition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Using a Cisco 1605R with AT&#038;T FastAccess DSL by Jim</title>
		<link>http://onebadpixel.com/blog/2008/01/25/using-a-cisco-1605r-with-att-fastaccess-dsl/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 07:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebadpixel.com/blog/2008/01/25/using-a-cisco-1605r-with-att-fastaccess-dsl/#comment-134</guid>
		<description>Frank, I used this config for quite some time, but found that the 1605R is just not fast enough to keep up with DSL or cable.  It experiences heavy collisions and dramatically reduces your throughput.  If you still want the IOS, let me know, but I have since upgraded to a 2611XM which is capable of handling the 10Mb/s I have now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank, I used this config for quite some time, but found that the 1605R is just not fast enough to keep up with DSL or cable.  It experiences heavy collisions and dramatically reduces your throughput.  If you still want the IOS, let me know, but I have since upgraded to a 2611XM which is capable of handling the 10Mb/s I have now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Using a Cisco 1605R with AT&#038;T FastAccess DSL by Frank</title>
		<link>http://onebadpixel.com/blog/2008/01/25/using-a-cisco-1605r-with-att-fastaccess-dsl/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 03:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebadpixel.com/blog/2008/01/25/using-a-cisco-1605r-with-att-fastaccess-dsl/#comment-133</guid>
		<description>Hi, i'e tried many different ios ive found on the net and non of them was having thhe ip package...could you snd me the vsion of on of that ios so i can throw away my old dlink??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, i&#8217;e tried many different ios ive found on the net and non of them was having thhe ip package&#8230;could you snd me the vsion of on of that ios so i can throw away my old dlink??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on DNSStuff alternative by Mills</title>
		<link>http://onebadpixel.com/blog/2007/11/04/dnsstuff-alternative/#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator>Mills</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 14:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebadpixel.com/blog/2007/11/04/dnsstuff-alternative/#comment-132</guid>
		<description>I use fixyourip.com it has a lot of the similar tools that DNSSTUFF offers and they seem to be adding more options weekly.

To bad dnsstuff has taken the road of commercialising their site, I agree  with the host of this site that if DNSSTUFF wanted to make some money just throw on some advertisements in key areas. I am sure with the large volume of users the site generates this could easily pay for itself.

http://www.fixyourip.com is a good alternate to some of dnsstuff tools.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use fixyourip.com it has a lot of the similar tools that DNSSTUFF offers and they seem to be adding more options weekly.</p>
<p>To bad dnsstuff has taken the road of commercialising their site, I agree  with the host of this site that if DNSSTUFF wanted to make some money just throw on some advertisements in key areas. I am sure with the large volume of users the site generates this could easily pay for itself.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fixyourip.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.fixyourip.com</a> is a good alternate to some of dnsstuff tools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An Alternative to DNSStuff&#8230; part 2 by tom</title>
		<link>http://onebadpixel.com/blog/2008/02/21/an-alternative-to-dnsstuff-part-2/#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 12:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebadpixel.com/blog/2008/02/21/an-alternative-to-dnsstuff-part-2/#comment-131</guid>
		<description>you might want to have a look at serversniff.net and clez.net.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you might want to have a look at serversniff.net and clez.net.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Digital storage and RAID. by Jim</title>
		<link>http://onebadpixel.com/blog/2008/05/10/digital-storage-and-raid/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 06:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://onebadpixel.com/blog/2008/05/10/digital-storage-and-raid/#comment-84</guid>
		<description>Since originally writing this post, I have revamped my design to a slightly more attractive solution.  Please check out &lt;a href="http://onebadpixel.com/blog/bbpress/topic.php?id=10" rel="nofollow"&gt;this forum thread&lt;/a&gt; for an updated design, along with the reasoning and new part numbers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since originally writing this post, I have revamped my design to a slightly more attractive solution.  Please check out <a href="http://onebadpixel.com/blog/bbpress/topic.php?id=10" rel="nofollow">this forum thread</a> for an updated design, along with the reasoning and new part numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on An Alternative to DNSStuff&#8230; part 2 by DNSStuff alternative &#124; One Bad Pixel</title>
		<link>http://onebadpixel.com/blog/2008/02/21/an-alternative-to-dnsstuff-part-2/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>DNSStuff alternative &#124; One Bad Pixel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 21:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebadpixel.com/blog/2008/02/21/an-alternative-to-dnsstuff-part-2/#comment-81</guid>
		<description>[...] There is lots of good comments on here, but if you are looking for the convenient list of all of the DNSStuff alternative sites I have found, please look at the followup post. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There is lots of good comments on here, but if you are looking for the convenient list of all of the DNSStuff alternative sites I have found, please look at the followup post. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on DNSStuff alternative by Jim</title>
		<link>http://onebadpixel.com/blog/2007/11/04/dnsstuff-alternative/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 21:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebadpixel.com/blog/2007/11/04/dnsstuff-alternative/#comment-80</guid>
		<description>Excellent!  I love to see new items.  I checked out the dnsqueries site and it looks pretty useful.  I have updated it onto &lt;a href="http://onebadpixel.com/blog/2008/02/21/an-alternative-to-dnsstuff-part-2/" rel="nofollow"&gt;the post titled "An Alternative to DNSStuff part 2"&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent!  I love to see new items.  I checked out the dnsqueries site and it looks pretty useful.  I have updated it onto <a href="http://onebadpixel.com/blog/2008/02/21/an-alternative-to-dnsstuff-part-2/" rel="nofollow">the post titled &#8220;An Alternative to DNSStuff part 2&#8243;</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on DNSStuff alternative by Bidone76</title>
		<link>http://onebadpixel.com/blog/2007/11/04/dnsstuff-alternative/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>Bidone76</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 14:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onebadpixel.com/blog/2007/11/04/dnsstuff-alternative/#comment-79</guid>
		<description>Hi, i wanted to report a new site i found around there. http://www.dnsqueries.com let you make every needed test on the DNS system</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, i wanted to report a new site i found around there. <a href="http://www.dnsqueries.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.dnsqueries.com</a> let you make every needed test on the DNS system</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
